{"id":184,"date":"2020-07-05T18:41:40","date_gmt":"2020-07-05T18:41:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ekonomikaaspolocnost.umb.sk\/?page_id=184"},"modified":"2026-07-03T12:00:29","modified_gmt":"2026-07-03T12:00:29","slug":"eticke-standardy-casopisu","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/aap.umb.sk\/?page_id=184","title":{"rendered":"ETICK\u00c9 \u0160TANDARDY \u010cASOPISU"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>Vyhl\u00e1senie o&nbsp;dodr\u017eiavan\u00ed publika\u010dnej etiky a&nbsp;o&nbsp;publika\u010dnej praxi<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-left\">Redak\u010dn\u00e1 rada recenzovan\u00e9ho vedeck\u00e9ho \u010dasopisu Acta Aerarii Publici prijala <mark style=\"background-color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)\" class=\"has-inline-color has-vivid-cyan-blue-color\">Etick\u00e9 \u0161tandardy \u010dasopisu Acta Aerarii Publici<\/mark>, ktor\u00e9 s\u00fa spracovan\u00e9 pod\u013ea \u0161tandardov dobr\u00fdch publika\u010dn\u00fdch mravov <em><a href=\"https:\/\/publicationethics.org\/core-practices\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/publicationethics.org\/core-practices\">Core Practices<\/a><\/em>, vypracovan\u00fdch medzin\u00e1rodnou <em>Komisiou pre publika\u010dn\u00fa etiku<\/em> &#8211; <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/publicationethics.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)<\/a>.  \u0160tandardy stanovuj\u00fa pr\u00e1va a povinnosti v\u0161etk\u00fdch z\u00fa\u010dastnen\u00fdch str\u00e1n publika\u010dn\u00e9ho procesu  (vydavate\u013e \u010dasopisu, redak\u010dn\u00e9 org\u00e1ny \u010dasopisu, recenzenti a autori) a s\u00fa z\u00e1v\u00e4zn\u00e9 pre v\u0161etky subjekty podie\u013eaj\u00face sa na publikovan\u00ed \u010dasopisu. Na\u0161im cie\u013eom je zaisti\u0165 maxim\u00e1lnu kvalitu, neutralitu, objektivitu a transparentnos\u0165 \u010dasopisu. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-left\">Vydavate\u013e a editori \u010dasopisu Acta Aerarii Publici prijali <mark style=\"background-color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)\" class=\"has-inline-color has-vivid-cyan-blue-color\">Z\u00e1sady transparentnosti a dobrej praxe v akademickom prostred\u00ed<\/mark> (<em><a href=\"https:\/\/publicationethics.org\/resources\/guidelines\/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/publicationethics.org\/resources\/guidelines\/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing\">Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing<\/a><\/em>), ktor\u00e9 uplat\u0148uj\u00fa na publikovan\u00fd obsah \u010dasopisu, redak\u010dn\u00e9 rozhodnutia s\u00fa zalo\u017een\u00e9 na vedeckom pr\u00edstupe. \u010casopis presadzuje my\u0161lienky dostupnosti, rozmanitosti, rovnosti a inkl\u00fazie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center\"><strong>Autor<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>Autor je povinn\u00fd sa pred odoslan\u00edm rukopisu obozn\u00e1mi\u0165 s&nbsp;Pokynmi pre autorov a&nbsp;Etick\u00fdmi \u0161tandardmi \u010dasopisu.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Autor odosiela rukopis na ofici\u00e1lny e-mail redakcie, ktor\u00fd je uveden\u00fd na str\u00e1nkach \u010dasopisu, v s\u00falade s Pokynmi na pod\u00e1vanie rukopisov.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Rukopis mus\u00ed by\u0165 p\u00f4vodn\u00fd, zalo\u017een\u00fd na vlastnom v\u00fdskume autora, m\u00e1 prezentova\u0165 vedeck\u00e9 v\u00fdsledky objekt\u00edvne a jasne a jeho obsah mus\u00ed by\u0165 v s\u00falade s cie\u013emi \u010dasopisu.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Autori nesm\u00fa s\u00fa\u010dasne predklada\u0165 rovnak\u00fd rukopis viacer\u00fdm \u010dasopisom a tie\u017e nepredkladaj\u00fa \u010dl\u00e1nky, ktor\u00e9 u\u017e bol kedysi publikovan\u00e9. Op\u00e4tovn\u00e9 publikovanie rovnak\u00e9ho v\u00fdskumu je neetick\u00e9 a nepr\u00edpustn\u00e9.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Autori musia by\u0165 spr\u00e1vne uveden\u00ed a v\u0161etci spoluautori sa musia podie\u013ea\u0165 na v\u00fdskume a pr\u00edprave \u010dl\u00e1nkov podstatnou mierou. Osoby, ktor\u00e9 neprispeli v\u00fdznamne, by nemali by\u0165 uveden\u00e9 ako autori. V\u0161etci spoluautori musia schv\u00e1li\u0165 kone\u010dn\u00fa verziu rukopisu a s\u00fahlasi\u0165 s jeho publikovan\u00edm.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Pr\u00e1ce in\u00fdch autorov, ktor\u00e9 boli pou\u017eit\u00e9 pri tvorbe \u010dl\u00e1nku, musia by\u0165 riadne citovan\u00e9 alebo uveden\u00e9.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Plagi\u00e1torstvo v akejko\u013evek forme je neetick\u00e9 a neprijate\u013en\u00e9 vr\u00e1tane prezentovania pr\u00e1ce inej ako vlastnej, kop\u00edrovania alebo parafr\u00e1zovania podstatn\u00fdch \u010dast\u00ed in\u00e9ho dokumentu bez uvedenia zdroja.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Autori s\u00fa povinn\u00ed zabezpe\u010di\u0165, \u017ee uveden\u00e9 \u00fadaje a v\u00fdsledky v\u00fdskumu s\u00fa presn\u00e9, nefal\u0161ovan\u00e9 a riadne prezentovan\u00e9.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Uveden\u00e9 pr\u00edpady poru\u0161enia etick\u00fdch princ\u00edpov s\u00fa d\u00f4vodom na odmietnutie rukopisu.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Autori by mali by\u0165 pripraven\u00ed zdie\u013ea\u0165 surov\u00e9 \u00fadaje v primeranej miere na kontrolu a umo\u017enenie replik\u00e1cie v\u00fdskumu in\u00fdmi vedcami. Pokia\u013e to nie je mo\u017en\u00e9 z d\u00f4vodu ochrany osobn\u00fdch \u00fadajov alebo in\u00fdch obmedzen\u00ed, mali by to uvies\u0165 v \u010dl\u00e1nku.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Ak \u010dl\u00e1nok obsahuje \u00fadaje o osob\u00e1ch, autori s\u00fa povinn\u00ed zabezpe\u010di\u0165 ochranu osobn\u00fdch \u00fadajov a z\u00edskanie s\u00fahlasu dotknut\u00fdch os\u00f4b s publikovan\u00edm t\u00fdchto \u00fadajov.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Autori s\u00fa povinn\u00ed deklarova\u0165 ak\u00e9ko\u013evek finan\u010dn\u00e9 alebo in\u00e9 konflikty z\u00e1ujmov, ktor\u00e9 by mohli ovplyvni\u0165 v\u00fdsledky alebo interpret\u00e1ciu ich pr\u00e1ce. Autor je zodpovedn\u00fd za uvedenie zdrojov financovania projektu a pr\u00ednosu vedeck\u00fdch a v\u00fdskumn\u00fdch in\u0161tit\u00faci\u00ed a \u010fal\u0161\u00edch subjektov.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Autori re\u0161pektuj\u00fa recenzn\u00fd proces a s\u00fa pripraven\u00ed prija\u0165 kon\u0161trukt\u00edvnu kritiku, odpoveda\u0165 na pripomienky recenzentov a v pr\u00edpade potreby upravi\u0165 rukopis v s\u00falade s odpor\u00fa\u010daniami.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>V pr\u00edpade, \u017ee sa po publikovan\u00ed zistia chyby alebo nepresnosti, autori s\u00fa povinn\u00ed spolupracova\u0165 s \u010dasopisom na oprave alebo stiahnut\u00ed \u010dl\u00e1nku.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Autor zaslan\u00edm rukopisu s\u00fahlas\u00ed s uveden\u00edm svojho mena, priezviska, pracoviska a kontaktnej e-mailovej adresy vo v\u00fdslednom \u010dl\u00e1nku.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Predlo\u017een\u00edm rukopisu autor poskytuje \u010dasopisu bezplatn\u00e9 pr\u00e1vo na jeho publikovanie, jeho autorsk\u00e9 a publika\u010dn\u00e9 pr\u00e1va s\u00fa zachovan\u00e9.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Autor s\u00fahlas\u00ed so zaraden\u00edm publikovan\u00e9ho \u010dl\u00e1nku do v\u0161etk\u00fdch datab\u00e1z, v ktor\u00fdch je \u010dasopis aktu\u00e1lne indexovan\u00fd alebo bude indexovan\u00fd v bud\u00facnosti.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center\"><strong>Recenzent<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>Recenzent je povinn\u00fd obozn\u00e1mi\u0165 sa s Etick\u00fdmi \u0161tandardmi \u010dasopisu, formou recenzn\u00e9ho posudku a sp\u00f4sobom jeho vypracovania.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Recenzenti by mali prij\u00edma\u0165 \u00falohu recenzenta iba vtedy, ak maj\u00fa potrebn\u00fa odborn\u00fa kvalifik\u00e1ciu a sk\u00fasenosti na hodnotenie obsahu rukopisu. Ak sa nec\u00edtia dostato\u010dne kvalifikovan\u00ed na pos\u00fadenie ur\u010dit\u00e9ho aspektu rukopisu, mali by to ozn\u00e1mi\u0165 redakcii \u010dasopisu.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Recenzenti by mali komunikova\u0165 s redakciou \u010dasopisu otvorene a \u010destne, poskytova\u0165 presn\u00e9 inform\u00e1cie o svojom odbornom zameran\u00ed a dostupnosti, a spolupracova\u0165 na zlep\u0161ovan\u00ed recenzn\u00e9ho procesu a kvality publikovan\u00fdch \u010dl\u00e1nkov.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Recenzenti musia by\u0165 nestrann\u00ed a objekt\u00edvni pri hodnoten\u00ed rukopisu. Ich hodnotenie by malo by\u0165 zalo\u017een\u00e9 na kvalit\u00e1ch rukopisu, bez osobn\u00fdch predsudkov alebo predpojatosti vo\u010di autorom. Kritika by mala by\u0165 kon\u0161trukt\u00edvna a podlo\u017een\u00e1 jasn\u00fdmi argumentmi.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Recenzenti s\u00fa povinn\u00ed deklarova\u0165 ak\u00e9ko\u013evek potenci\u00e1lne konflikty z\u00e1ujmov, ktor\u00e9 by mohli ovplyvni\u0165 ich objektivitu. Ak existuje v\u00fdznamn\u00fd konflikt z\u00e1ujmov, recenzent by mal odmietnu\u0165 recenziu dan\u00e9ho rukopisu.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Recenzenti musia zachov\u00e1va\u0165 d\u00f4vernos\u0165 v\u0161etk\u00fdch materi\u00e1lov, ktor\u00e9 im boli poskytnut\u00e9 na recenzovanie. Nesm\u00fa diskutova\u0165 o obsahu rukopisu s nik\u00fdm mimo redakcie \u010dasopisu ani pou\u017e\u00edva\u0165 inform\u00e1cie z\u00edskan\u00e9 po\u010das recenzn\u00e9ho procesu pre vlastn\u00fd prospech.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Recenzenti musia re\u0161pektova\u0165 du\u0161evn\u00e9 vlastn\u00edctvo autorov. Nemali by pou\u017e\u00edva\u0165 \u017eiadne inform\u00e1cie, \u00fadaje alebo my\u0161lienky z rukopisov pre svoje vlastn\u00e9 v\u00fdskumn\u00e9 projekty bez s\u00fahlasu autorov.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Recenzenti by mali poskytn\u00fa\u0165 jasn\u00e9, detailn\u00e9 a korektn\u00e9 hodnotenie rukopisu. Musia od\u00f4vodni\u0165 svoje odpor\u00fa\u010dania a pripomienky, identifikova\u0165 siln\u00e9 aj slab\u00e9 str\u00e1nky rukopisu a navrhn\u00fa\u0165 zlep\u0161enia, ak je to potrebn\u00e9.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Recenzenti by mali by\u0165 pozorn\u00ed vo\u010di mo\u017en\u00fdm etick\u00fdm probl\u00e9mom, ako je plagi\u00e1torstvo, fal\u0161ovanie \u00fadajov alebo neopr\u00e1vnen\u00e9 publikovanie. Ak maj\u00fa podozrenie na poru\u0161enie etick\u00fdch \u0161tandardov, mali by to okam\u017eite ozn\u00e1mi\u0165 redakcii.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Recenzenti by mali vykon\u00e1va\u0165 recenzovanie v primeranom \u010dase a dodr\u017eiava\u0165 stanoven\u00e9 term\u00edny. Ak nie s\u00fa schopn\u00ed dodr\u017ea\u0165 term\u00edn, mali by o tom okam\u017eite informova\u0165 redakciu, aby mohli by\u0165 ur\u010den\u00ed in\u00ed recenzenti.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>V anonymnom recenznom konan\u00ed, ktor\u00e9 zabezpe\u010duje \u010dasopis, by recenzenti mali zachova\u0165 svoju anonymitu a neodha\u013eova\u0165 svoju identitu autorom ani po ukon\u010den\u00ed recenzn\u00e9ho procesu. <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>V\u0161etky recenzie sa robia anonymne. Redakcia nezdie\u013ea \u00fadaje autorov s recenzentmi.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>V\u017edy sa posudzuje predlo\u017een\u00fd rukopis aspo\u0148 dvoma recenzentmi z extern\u00e9ho prostredia.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>V\u00fdsledkom recenzn\u00e9ho konania m\u00f4\u017ee by\u0165 prijatie bez zmien, \u00faprava, prepracovanie alebo zamietnutie rukopisu.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Recenzent pom\u00e1ha redakcii a redak\u010dnej rade pri rozhodovan\u00ed o&nbsp;tom, \u010di m\u00e1 by\u0165 rukopis \u010dl\u00e1nku uverejnen\u00fd alebo neuverejnen\u00fd. Pripomienky recenzenta v recenznom posudku sl\u00fa\u017eia na zlep\u0161enie kvality predlo\u017een\u00e9ho \u010dl\u00e1nku.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center\"><strong>\u010casopis<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>\u010casopis a jeho s\u00fa\u010dasti (vydavate\u013e, redakcia a redak\u010dn\u00e1 rada) sa zav\u00e4zuje kona\u0165 a vystupova\u0165 vo\u010di v\u0161etk\u00fdm z\u00fa\u010dastnen\u00fdm stran\u00e1m v publika\u010dnom procese v s\u00falade s etick\u00fdmi \u0161tandardmi a dodr\u017eiava\u0165 nielen dobr\u00e9 publika\u010dn\u00e9 mravy, ale aj d\u00f4veryhodnos\u0165 \u010dasopisu.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Redaktori a \u010dlenovia redak\u010dnej rady musia deklarova\u0165 ak\u00e9ko\u013evek konflikty z\u00e1ujmov, ktor\u00e9 by mohli ovplyvni\u0165 ich rozhodovanie. Ak existuje v\u00fdznamn\u00fd konflikt z\u00e1ujmov, dan\u00fd \u010dlen by nemal rozhodova\u0165 o \u010dl\u00e1nku a mal by sa zdr\u017ea\u0165 ak\u00e9hoko\u013evek ovplyv\u0148ovania publika\u010dn\u00e9ho procesu.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u010casopis mus\u00ed zverejni\u0165 jasn\u00e9 pokyny pre autorov a recenzentov, ktor\u00ed vstupuj\u00fa do cel\u00e9ho publika\u010dn\u00e9ho procesu. Tieto pokyny by mali by\u0165 dostupn\u00e9, jasne definovan\u00e9 a transparentn\u00e9.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Redaktori \u010dasopisu musia zabezpe\u010di\u0165 nez\u00e1vislos\u0165 redak\u010dn\u00e9ho procesu. Rozhodnutia o publikovan\u00ed \u010dl\u00e1nkov musia by\u0165 zalo\u017een\u00e9 v\u00fdhradne na akademick\u00fdch krit\u00e9ri\u00e1ch a vedeckej hodnote, nie na osobn\u00fdch z\u00e1ujmoch, finan\u010dn\u00fdch tlakoch alebo in\u00fdch vonkaj\u0161\u00edch faktoroch.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Redakcia \u010dasopisu mus\u00ed zachov\u00e1va\u0165 d\u00f4vernos\u0165 rukopisov a inform\u00e1ci\u00ed z recenzn\u00e9ho procesu. <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Redaktori s\u00fa zodpovedn\u00ed za zabezpe\u010denie spravodliv\u00e9ho, objekt\u00edvneho a nestrann\u00e9ho recenzn\u00e9ho procesu. Musia vybera\u0165 recenzentov, ktor\u00ed s\u00fa odborn\u00edkmi v danej oblasti a nemaj\u00fa konflikty z\u00e1ujmov.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u010casopis zabezpe\u010duje anonymn\u00e9 recenzn\u00e9 konanie dvomi nez\u00e1visl\u00fdmi recenzentmi.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Bez recenzn\u00e9ho konania publikuje \u010dasopis iba rukopisy informat\u00edvneho charakteru, spr\u00e1vy a recenzie.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>V pr\u00edpade podozrenia na etick\u00e9 poru\u0161enie, ako je plagi\u00e1torstvo, fal\u0161ovanie \u00fadajov alebo in\u00e9 nevhodn\u00e9 praktiky, redakcia \u010dasopisu mus\u00ed podnikn\u00fa\u0165 primeran\u00e9 kroky na vy\u0161etrenie a rie\u0161enie t\u00fdchto probl\u00e9mov. To m\u00f4\u017ee zah\u0155\u0148a\u0165 kontaktovanie autorov, ich in\u0161tit\u00faci\u00ed alebo in\u00fdch pr\u00edslu\u0161n\u00fdch org\u00e1nov.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u010casopis mus\u00ed by\u0165 pripraven\u00fd na opravu, stiahnutie alebo vydanie vyhl\u00e1senia t\u00fdkaj\u00faceho sa publikovan\u00fdch \u010dl\u00e1nkov, ak sa po publikovan\u00ed zistia chyby alebo nepresnosti. Proces tak\u00fdchto opr\u00e1v mus\u00ed by\u0165 jasne definovan\u00fd a transparentn\u00fd.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u010casopis mus\u00ed zabezpe\u010di\u0165 dlhodob\u00fa dostupnos\u0165 a archiv\u00e1ciu publikovan\u00fdch \u010dl\u00e1nkov, \u010di u\u017e v printovej alebo elektronickej verzii.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u010casopis by mal ma\u0165 definovan\u00e9 politiky t\u00fdkaj\u00face sa otvoren\u00e9ho pr\u00edstupu alebo in\u00fdch foriem spr\u00edstupnenia obsahu verejnosti.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Podozrenie na poru\u0161enie etick\u00fdch \u0161tandardov \u010dasopisu alebo ich poru\u0161enie v&nbsp;akejko\u013evek forme alebo neetick\u00e9 spr\u00e1vanie musia by\u0165 neodkladne ohl\u00e1sen\u00e9 \u010dasopisu. Na pre\u0161etrenie predmetnej veci musia by\u0165 \u010dasopisu v&nbsp;tejto s\u00favislosti poskytnut\u00e9 v\u0161etky inform\u00e1cie a&nbsp;d\u00f4kazy.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>O kone\u010dnom rozhodnut\u00ed o publikovan\u00ed textu rozhoduje redak\u010dn\u00e1 rada na z\u00e1klade v\u00fdsledkov anonymn\u00e9ho recenzn\u00e9ho konania.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Redaktori alebo \u010dlenovia redak\u010dnej rady, ktor\u00ed publikuj\u00fa v ich vlastnom \u010dasopise, musia zabezpe\u010di\u0165, aby nedo\u0161lo k zneu\u017eitiu ich poz\u00edcie.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>\u010casopis prijat\u00fdmi <em>Etick\u00fdmi \u0161tandardmi \u010dasopisu<\/em> podporuje transparentnos\u0165 a dobr\u00fa prax v akademickom publikovan\u00ed<\/strong> a <strong>riadi sa <em>Z\u00e1sadami transparentnosti a dobrej praxe v akademickom prostred\u00ed<\/em>.<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-file\"><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-3c1474b3-f0d4-47c2-8c82-c21306c690ba\" href=\"https:\/\/aap.umb.sk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Zasady-transparentnosti-a-dobrej-praxe-v-akademickom-publikovani.docx\">Zasady-transparentnosti-a-dobrej-praxe-v-akademickom-publikovani<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/aap.umb.sk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Zasady-transparentnosti-a-dobrej-praxe-v-akademickom-publikovani.docx\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-3c1474b3-f0d4-47c2-8c82-c21306c690ba\">Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<pre class=\"wp-block-verse has-text-align-right\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/aap.umb.sk\/?page_id=2512\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/aap.umb.sk\/?page_id=2512\">ETHICAL STANDARDS<\/a><\/strong><\/pre>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-group is-vertical is-layout-flex wp-container-2 wp-block-group-is-layout-flex\">\n<p><strong>VYU\u017d\u00cdVANIE UMELEJ INTELIGENCIE<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-group is-vertical is-layout-flex wp-container-1 wp-block-group-is-layout-flex\">\n<p>\u010casopis akceptuje pr\u00ednos generat\u00edvnej umelej inteligencie a n\u00e1strojov zalo\u017een\u00fdch na umelej inteligencii pri zvy\u0161ovan\u00ed efekt\u00edvnosti v\u00fdskumn\u00fdch procesov, podpore tvorby poznatkov a zlep\u0161ovan\u00ed kvality v\u00fdstupov vedeckej pr\u00e1ce.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u010casopis si je vedom\u00fd, \u017ee n\u00e1stup umelej inteligencie v\u00fdrazne zv\u00fd\u0161il potrebu d\u00f4kladne zv\u00e1\u017ei\u0165 vyu\u017e\u00edvanie AI v&nbsp;oblasti vedeck\u00e9ho publikovania, a to so zrete\u013eom na jej potenci\u00e1l aj rizik\u00e1.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pri pou\u017e\u00edvan\u00ed umelej inteligencie (artificial intelligence \u2013 AI)a&nbsp;jej n\u00e1strojov je nevyhnutn\u00e9, aby v\u0161etci \u00fa\u010dastn\u00edci recenzn\u00e9ho konania dodr\u017eiavali stanoven\u00e9 pravidl\u00e1.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-group is-vertical is-layout-flex wp-container-4 wp-block-group-is-layout-flex\">\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center\">                                                 <strong>Vyu\u017e\u00edvanie umelej inteligencie autormi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-group is-vertical is-layout-flex wp-container-3 wp-block-group-is-layout-flex\">\n<p>Autor (autorsk\u00ed kolekt\u00edv) nesie pln\u00fa zodpovednos\u0165 za obsah rukopisu vr\u00e1tane spr\u00e1vnosti \u00fadajov, originality, vedeckej integrity, interpret\u00e1cie v\u00fdsledkov a v\u0161etk\u00fdch z\u00e1verov uveden\u00fdch v&nbsp;predlo\u017eenom \u010dl\u00e1nku.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Autori m\u00f4\u017eu pri pr\u00edprave rukopisu vyu\u017e\u00edva\u0165 n\u00e1stroje generat\u00edvnej AI v\u00fdlu\u010dne ako podporn\u00fd prostriedok, napr\u00edklad na jazykov\u00e9 \u00fapravy, \u0161tylistick\u00fa korekt\u00faru, preklad alebo technick\u00fa pomoc pri spracovan\u00ed textu. Pou\u017eitie t\u00fdchto n\u00e1strojov nie je potrebn\u00e9 uv\u00e1dza\u0165.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Autori s\u00fa povinn\u00ed obozn\u00e1mi\u0165 sa s podmienkami pou\u017e\u00edvania n\u00e1strojov AI, ktor\u00e9 vyu\u017e\u00edvaj\u00fa pri pr\u00edprave rukopisu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ak boli vyu\u017e\u00edvan\u00e9 in\u00e9 n\u00e1stroje AI pou\u017eit\u00e9 pri pr\u00edprave rukopisu, autori s\u00fa povinn\u00ed t\u00fato skuto\u010dnos\u0165 transparentne uvies\u0165 pri predlo\u017een\u00ed rukopisu. Vyhl\u00e1senie mus\u00ed obsahova\u0165 n\u00e1zov pou\u017eit\u00e9ho n\u00e1stroja, stru\u010dn\u00fd opis \u00fa\u010delu jeho vyu\u017eitia a&nbsp;sp\u00f4sobu a&nbsp;tie\u017e rozsah. Neuvedenie relevantn\u00e9ho pou\u017eitia AI sa pova\u017euje za poru\u0161enie publika\u010dnej etiky.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Deklarovanie o&nbsp;vyu\u017eit\u00ed n\u00e1strojov AI sa uv\u00e1dza v&nbsp;\u00favode \u010dl\u00e1nku aj resp. v&nbsp;metodickej \u010dasti \u010dl\u00e1nku.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ak sa vo v\u00fdskumnej \u010dinnosti&nbsp; vyu\u017e\u00edva samotn\u00e1 met\u00f3da\/anal\u00fdza\/n\u00e1vrh vyu\u017e\u00edvania AI, mus\u00ed to by\u0165 jasne uveden\u00e9.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>N\u00e1stroje AI nesp\u013a\u0148aj\u00fa krit\u00e9ri\u00e1 autorstva, a preto nem\u00f4\u017eu by\u0165 uveden\u00e9 ako autor alebo spoluautor vedeck\u00e9ho \u010dl\u00e1nku, nie je ich mo\u017en\u00e9 citova\u0165 ako pou\u017eit\u00fd zdroj.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Redakcia \u010dasopisu si vyhradzuje pr\u00e1vo vy\u017eiada\u0165 od autorov dopl\u0148uj\u00face inform\u00e1cie o pou\u017eit\u00ed n\u00e1strojov AI, ak je to potrebn\u00e9 na pos\u00fadenie vedeckej integrity rukopisu.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-group is-vertical is-layout-flex wp-container-5 wp-block-group-is-layout-flex\">\n<p>                                         <strong>Vyu\u017e\u00edvanie umelej inteligencie recenzentmi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Odborn\u00e9 pos\u00fadenie rukopisu, hodnotenie jeho vedeckej kvality, originality, metodologickej spr\u00e1vnosti a odpor\u00fa\u010danie redakcii musia by\u0165 v\u00fdsledkom nez\u00e1visl\u00e9ho odborn\u00e9ho \u00fasudku recenzenta.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recenzent nesie pln\u00fa zodpovednos\u0165 za obsah recenzn\u00e9ho posudku a za zachovanie z\u00e1sad d\u00f4veryhodnosti, objektivity a etiky recenzn\u00e9ho konania.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recenzenti s\u00fa povinn\u00ed zachov\u00e1va\u0165 d\u00f4vernos\u0165 v\u0161etk\u00fdch materi\u00e1lov poskytnut\u00fdch na recenzn\u00e9 konanie. Rukopisy ani ich \u010dasti nesm\u00fa nahr\u00e1va\u0165 do verejne dostupn\u00fdch alebo komer\u010dn\u00fdch n\u00e1strojov generat\u00edvnej AI.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recenzent je pri hodnoten\u00ed vedeckej kvality \u010dl\u00e1nku povinn\u00fd zoh\u013eadni\u0165 inform\u00e1cie uveden\u00e9 autorom (autorsk\u00fdm kolekt\u00edvom) pri vyu\u017e\u00edvan\u00ed n\u00e1strojov AI. Recenzent m\u00e1 pozna\u0165 pr\u00edslu\u0161n\u00e9 pravidl\u00e1, aby mohol kontrolova\u0165 pr\u00edpadn\u00e9 nepovolen\u00e9 pou\u017eitie.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Vyhl\u00e1senie o&nbsp;dodr\u017eiavan\u00ed publika\u010dnej etiky a&nbsp;o&nbsp;publika\u010dnej praxi: Redak\u010dn\u00e1 rada recenzovan\u00e9ho vedeck\u00e9ho \u010dasopisu Acta Aerarii Publici prijala Etick\u00e9 \u0161tandardy \u010dasopisu Acta Aerarii Publici, ktor\u00e9 s\u00fa spracovan\u00e9 pod\u013ea \u0161tandardov dobr\u00fdch publika\u010dn\u00fdch mravov Core Practices, vypracovan\u00fdch medzin\u00e1rodnou Komisiou pre publika\u010dn\u00fa etiku &#8211; Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). \u0160tandardy stanovuj\u00fa pr\u00e1va a povinnosti v\u0161etk\u00fdch z\u00fa\u010dastnen\u00fdch str\u00e1n publika\u010dn\u00e9ho procesu (vydavate\u013e \u010dasopisu, &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/aap.umb.sk\/?page_id=184\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;ETICK\u00c9 \u0160TANDARDY \u010cASOPISU&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"parent":2920,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/aap.umb.sk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/184"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/aap.umb.sk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/aap.umb.sk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aap.umb.sk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aap.umb.sk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=184"}],"version-history":[{"count":72,"href":"https:\/\/aap.umb.sk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/184\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4657,"href":"https:\/\/aap.umb.sk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/184\/revisions\/4657"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aap.umb.sk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2920"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/aap.umb.sk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=184"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}